Suffer the Children
I was going to post a review of the Criterion Collection’s Special Edition of Fritz Lang’s M, but while dicking around on the web I was reminded of the shocking true story of a child killer that hits close to home.
Back in September, 30 year-old Hannah Overton was convicted of the capital murder of her four year-old foster son, Andrew Burd, and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
This is an extremely condensed version of the Hannah Overton case: Andrew Burd died on October 3, 2006 after being forced to drink two cups full of water mixed with salt, pepper, chili powder and cajun seasoning. After Andrew threw up from drinking the mixture of water and spices, he stopped breathing. Hannah Overton did not call for an ambulance. Instead, she called her husband, Larry, who came home from work. The Overtons waited over an hour before taking their foster child to get any sort of help. By then, of course, it was too late.
The details of the case are complex; Andrew Burd was what would be considered a “special needs” child. He supposedly had ADHD, an eating disorder and some severe behavioral problems. For example, in the days before his death, Andrew slept on a bed made of plywood because he defecated in his bed and smeared it around on the sheets. Furthermore, there were some heavily disputed allegations of physical abuse made during the trial. Defense experts say that the bruises came from CPR and hypodermic needles while the child was being treated by doctors; prosecution witnesses said otherwise. There was also some head trauma involved, with the defense claiming it had occurred in an earlier traffic accident.
I’m by no means one of these people who immediately shuts off their brain and reacts on a purely emotional basis when it comes to children. Given more facts, I could probably agree that Hannah Overton’s sentence is a bit severe, but I’m not going to lose any sleep knowing that she’s going to spend the rest of her life in prison.
However, there are a bunch of people who disagree with me. I find it odd that the first group of people to fall back on the “won’t somebody think of the children?” argument are the very same people who want us to forget that a four year-old child died.
Yes, I’m talking about Christians.
I shouldn’t have to make this disclaimer, but I will: I’m not one of these atheists who think that parents who bring their children up religiously are guilty of child abuse. While I think some extreme forms of religious belief cross the line, I don’t in any way think that being a Christian automatically makes a person a bad parent.
Now that’s out of the way, I gotta say that some of the stuff I read about the Hannah Overton case sickens me to the point that I want to grab someone by their lapels and scream “ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND?”
Rod Carver, the pastor at Hannah’s church is on record at (where else?) Worldnet Daily as saying:
For all the Christians out there, understand this, Hannah’s simple faith was used against her as the prosecution incessantly sought to make her out to be a religious sociopath.
Mind you, he’s talking about the prosecutors in that hotbed of Christian persecution, Corpus Christi, Texas. This is a city that has seriously discussed building a giant statue of Jesus in Corpus Christi Bay. This is a city whose name is Latin for “Body of Christ”, for fuck’s sake.
The Worldnet Daily article puts some serious spin on the facts of the case:
Andrew had an eating disorder of some kind that left him hungry all the time – even immediately after a meal. If he didn’t get more food, he would become quite agitated. She was told by someone familiar with such symptoms to add something distasteful to the child’s food once he had clearly had enough. First she tried lemon juice, but Andrew liked it. Next she tried Zatarain’s Cajun Seasoning. But he liked that, too. She believes she may have administered in food and drink one-quarter of a teaspoon to Andrew prior to his attack.
One-quarter of a teaspoon? Here’s what Dr. Alexandre Rotta had to say during the trial:
Then Dr. Rotta spelled out the sodium levels for the jury that were found in Andrew’s body.
The normal range is 135 to 145. Andrew’s was 245 at Spohn South and 255 at Driscoll. He also said one would have to eat 23 teaspoons of Zatarain’s Creole Spice Mix , or six teaspoons of salt to get a level that high.
A lot of people have a hard time believing that a mother would force a four year-old child to drink a concoction of food seasonings… not me. In fact, there’s a precedent. When a Christian mother needs parenting advice, what better person to turn to than Lisa Whelchel, better known as “Blair” on the 80s sitcom, Facts of Life? Call me optimistic, but I’d like to think that I live in a world where no one gives a fuck about what a washed-up child actress has to say about parenting, but Whelchel has other “credentials” that apparently qualify her to dispense advice on how to raise abuse children. For starters, Lisa Whelchel has spit not one, but three, children out of her vagina. If that’s not enough, Lisa is a born-again Christian. To top things off, her book, Creative Correction bears the Focus on the Family seal of approval.
Whelchel’s book is proof positive that there is nothing, no matter how offensive or ridiculously insane, that people won’t swallow if it’s published under the rubric of Christianity. Creative Correction is nothing more than a how-to on child abuse. I’ll admit that I haven’t read the book, nor do I plan on ever reading it. Take a look at the customer reviews at Amazon and look at all the 5 star reviews that complain about Whelchel’s advice being “taken out of context” (where have we heard that before?). Now take a look at some quotes and page scans from the book.
You know, if someone published this shit under the title of “Creative Correction: An Atheist’s Guide to Parenting” there would be riots in the streets. But stamp the adjective “godly” on just about any affront to decency and it’s almost beyond reproach. In fairness I should say that there are plenty of confessed Christians on the Amazon customer review pages and message boards who see the book for sadistic obscenity that it is. It would, however, be nice if Focus on the Family would admit they made a huge mistake in publishing this garbage. We know that’s never going to happen, though.
I’ll never know exactly what happened in the Overton home on October 3, 2006, but one fact stands clear: Andrew Burd is dead because of Hannah Overton’s parenting methods. It doesn’t matter why she gave the kid Cajun seasoning nor does it matter how much. What matters is that Andrew Burd died at her hands. What matters to members of her church, however, is that… well, that Hannah and Larry Overton were members of their church.
The Calvary Chapel of the Coastlands has set up a “Free Hannah” website that makes the mind boggle. Particularly nauseating is the “Fact vs. Fiction” page, which refers to Andrew’s death as “the incident”. They actually claim that Andrew wanted the Cajun seasoning. Great Fucking Christ, if I ever experience cognitive dissonance on this level I hope someone shoots me.
The “Free Hannah” movement is spreading, too. Under the category of “Persecuted Christians” (can you believe this shit?), the Reformed Covenanter blog has this to say:
Our brother Rev. John Otis (Westminster RPCUS) has requested prayer for the homeschooling mother Hannah Overton - unjustly convicted of causing her child’s death - whose has a hearing this Monday concerning whether there should be a retrial or the case should be dismissed.
The name Andrew Burd is nowhere to be found in that article. No prayer requests for Andrew’s biological family. No prayer requests for the inevitable future victims of abuse under the guise of “godly parenting”. They want Christians to pray that a child killer goes free.
Fortunately for Hannah Overton’s surviving offspring, there is no god to answer those prayers.

I’m running out of naming options for these increasingly sick people. I started out a month ago with Church Burners. Then I had to add Ebola Boys. Church Burning Ebola Boys. Now what - Church Burning Baby Butchering Ebola Boys? That’s too long. Too unwieldy. Any suggestions would be appreciated. (Source: 




January 26th, 2008 at 12:19 pm
As one review says: “In this bizaare and abuse-filled book, former actress Lisa Whelchel calls children these cruel names: ankle-biter, pests, “a handful”, raucous, haphazard, messy, pesky, hyenas, arrogant, and “filled with schemes to do wrong.” Yet on p.193 the author says name-calling isn’t allowed in her house!”
That’s “absolute morality” for you.
You will absolutely do what the fuck I say. I will do whatever the hell I like.
Hey, if it’s good enough for God…
January 26th, 2008 at 4:02 pm
Those page scans are something else. In addition to all the create-a-zombie-for-Jesus stuff, I get the impression that she implements some of those punishments just to amuse herself.
There’s also some controversy about the customer comments, a la the Design of Life dust up. Supposedly critical reviews from qualified child psychologists were removed. My support for a free press goes so far as to being opposed to Amazon removing the book, but there really needs to be some sort of disclaimer like, “WARNING: If you think any of the advice in this book is useful, please get yourself sterilized. NOW.”
January 27th, 2008 at 4:11 am
While I’m not really going to address the religious idiocy, the simple fact is that there was no excuse whatsoever for what they did to the poor kid. If they cannot handle a special-needs foster child, they should tell the state or whatever agency was overseeing it and have him placed in another home. It happens all the time. You don’t just say “hey, this kid is obnoxious, let’s kill him!”
Sorry, I don’t have any sympathy for her in this case.
March 23rd, 2008 at 8:26 pm
I am very bothered by this case because of the legal facts.
If the cops think you are guilty of manslaughter, they might charge you with murder to try & get you to plead down to manslaughter.
And if you are guilty of manslaughter & go to trial for murder, the fact you had no intent to kill might seem irrelevant to a jury when facing the tragedy of a dead child.
The husband wasn’t even home when the event occurred. It appears he believed & still believes her version that she only gave him a drink with a little shake of seasoning. There was no real evidence of any abuse before this day, yet he was also charged with capital murder. I believe the sole reason was to get him to testify against her.
Just recently he finally accepted a deal & entered a plea of Nolo contendere to Criminally Negligent Homicide. Larry received a sentence of five years adjudicated probation.
How can ANYONE think they EVER had evidence of murder when they offered him such a plea!!!
I think that nutcase, Rod Carver did a great job of distracting the public from the real injustice of this case with his paranoid rantings!
March 28th, 2008 at 11:00 pm
BTW, a juror just recently released a sworn affidavit stating there was confusion concerning the criteria needed to convict.
She is likely to be granted a new trial. If so, I hope they charge her with manslaughter or felony injury to a child, because there was clearly no intent to kill. (Many details indicate this)
I do think she is guilty of a crime in Andrew’s death. I hope her ’supporters’ . especially her husband will eventually see the light & stop deluding themselves about her.
August 16th, 2008 at 5:43 pm
I have detailed, documented information on this case. Hannah Overton is innocent.
A GREAT DEAL of the information in the above posts is inaccurate. Wrong. False. No bueno.
For example, Hannah did not force Andrew to drink “two cups full of water mixed with salt, pepper, chili powder and cajun seasoning.”
That myth started with an affidavit filed by a CPS worker that said Hannah had confessed to doing that and to beating Andrew. Problem is, that information was proven false in a family court hearing. The investigator said he had no idea where that info came from. The individual who filed the affidavit no longer works for CPS. What did the local media do? They just stopped reporting some of the more sensational details and kept the parts about giving spices in water as punishment. It sells more papers that way.
Andrew died because his sodium levels were off the charts. Because of a hurried & incomplete autopsy, we may never know exactly why his sodium was so high. We do know there were several indications of diabetes, which can cause the body to retain salt. We know that the canned soup he was eating that was flavored with Zatarain’s is high in sodium. But 23 teaspoons? No. BTW, Zatarain’s keeps its ingredients a secret, so no one but them knows how much sodium it contains. Seems an unlikely murder weapon.
The highest likelihood is that Andrew’s body was not processing sodium correctly due to an undiagnosed disorder and that combined with high sodium foods or something he ate on his own tipped him over the threshold.
Hypernatremia takes about an hour and a half to fully manifest the symptoms. In an hour and a half from when Andrew first threw up and said he was cold, the Overtons had him at the nearest Urgent Care Clinic.
It took medical staff at that clinic and 2 hospitals, plus lab tests, to figure out what was wrong with Andrew. Why would Hannah or any lay person be expected to know immediately what was wrong? Andrew had been throwing temper tantrums not long before he got sick — if your 4 year old had tantrums then threw up, would you call 911? That’s what they convicted her of — not calling 911, not seeking medical attention “soon enough.”
In hindsight, it’s easy to say she should have done this or that. In the moment, with the information she had, it was not at all clear.
This is not a left vs right, Christian vs Other issue. This is about a justice system that needs reform because it rewards prosecutors for convictions, not justice. And it provides no oversight for prosecutors and many other authorities. For example, the medical examiner in this case, who pronounced the manner of death as “homicide” did so on insufficient evidence. He testified — and there was news coverage in June, 2007 — that he is overworked and performing far more autopsies than is allowed by the regulating board. Not to mention that the investigator was standing there while the autopsy was performed, with his police report in hand.
That’s just the tip of the iceberg . . . the appeal brief lists 30 issues . . .
By the way, Hannah and Larry do not subscribe to the “Creative Correction” principles.
If you want complete info and supporting documentation, contact JusticeReform@gmail.com.