Casey Luskin is a Douchebag
I was going to post a couple of Devo videos and call it a day, but after being tagged as an Enemy of Intelligent Design, I figured it would be best if I remain vigilant.
Over at Bloggers for Peer-Reviewed Research Reporting, they’re discussing whether or not uberdouchebag Casey Luskin’s theft appropriation of the BPR3 graphic is acceptable. Survey says… hell no!
Desperate to make his bullshit seem legitimate, Discovery Institute shill and all-around assclown Casey Luskin simply did a right-click and “Save Image As” on the BPR3’s icon and used it to prop up his DI propaganda.
Casey Luskin - who recently sent out one of those cease-and-desist letters that are usually issued under the Church of Scientology’s letterhead - actually lifted a graphic from an another website. What a douchebag.
Perhaps the ignorant rubes at Uncommon Descent think Luskin is actually “Blogging on Peer-Reviewed Research”, but the rest of the world knows he stamped that graphic on yet another quote-mined Discovery Institute press release in the futile hope of lending authenticity to his douchebaggery.
If you think that Luskin will remove the graphic until he goes through the proper channels to get BPR3’s approval, think again. If he takes down the graphic at all, look for him to write a 500-word press release bitching about how he’s being persecuted by “Darwinists”. Through the lens of Luskin’s douche-colored glasses, there will need to be a sequel to Expelled focusing on his rough treatment at the hands of the evil materialists.
I swear, every day it’s something new with these nitwits. They complain about how they’re being shut out of academia, yet every single thing they do seems to be a calculated move to make themselves look like crackpots. How deluded does one have to be to still think that Intelligent Design is anything other than a perpetual motion machine that produces an endless supply of idiocy? Although that was a rhetorical question, here’s a rhetorical answer: Salvador Cordova.
p.s. - if anyone wants to use the “Blogging On Pseudoscientific Douchebags” graphic, here’s the code:
<a href=”http://www.cbebs.org/”>
<img src=”http://media.cbebs.org/bpsdb01.png” alt=”BPSDB” align=”left” height=”87″ width=”117″ />
</a>
I’m running out of naming options for these increasingly sick people. I started out a month ago with Church Burners. Then I had to add Ebola Boys. Church Burning Ebola Boys. Now what - Church Burning Baby Butchering Ebola Boys? That’s too long. Too unwieldy. Any suggestions would be appreciated. (Source: 
February 5th, 2008 at 10:07 am
I call - Casey Luskin is a Double Douche Bag!
So, not to denigrate Luskin’s douchiness, but only in the interest of science, my question is Whos Is The Ultimate ID Douche?
Is it Densee O’Dreary? Lyin’ Luskin? Dufus Dembksi? Dave Shitforbrains Springer?
I just don’t see a resolution here, as they are all Total Douchebags in their own way.
And I guess that since this IS a thread about luskin, we have to give it to him, it’s only fair right?
February 5th, 2008 at 10:27 am
I think “serial douchebag” or “recidivist douchebag” is a good description of Casey Luskin.
You do bring up an interesting - and tough - question, J-Dog: Just who is ID’s biggest douchebag? Trying to decide if Dembski is a bigger douchebag than Luskin is like having to decide which hurts worse, poking an icepick in your left eye or your right eye.
February 5th, 2008 at 11:32 am
Will posts using the graphic be aggregated anywhere?
Bob
February 5th, 2008 at 1:44 pm
That’s a good question, Bob. If more people other than me and Abbie start using the graphic, it might be worth the effort.
February 5th, 2008 at 3:51 pm
Nice post. I just wanted to let you know that I stole your icon for my discussion of the issue.
November 12th, 2008 at 7:58 pm
sht6o8excx353b0a