<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ID isn&#8217;t Creationism? It ain&#8217;t science, either!</title>
	<link>http://www.cbebs.org/2008/03/17/id-isnt-creationism-it-aint-science-either/</link>
	<description>The Church Burnin' Ebola Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 10:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Airtightnoodle</title>
		<link>http://www.cbebs.org/2008/03/17/id-isnt-creationism-it-aint-science-either/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Airtightnoodle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cbebs.org/2008/03/17/id-isnt-creationism-it-aint-science-either/#comment-482</guid>
		<description>But intelligent design IS science.  That's why you've seen such a surge recently in all the intelligent design published research (so it can be peer-reviewed).

Oh...wait...

No.  

IDers want to circumvent the scientific process.  While other scientists work their butts off researching, writing, presenting, and defending their work, allowing it to be peer-reviewed and picked apart, IDers want to just skip all that by appealing to the general public and the government.  "Give us our place in the textbooks too!"

It isn't just a threat to biology.  It undermines all of science.  It's frightening.

http://airtightnoodle.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But intelligent design IS science.  That&#8217;s why you&#8217;ve seen such a surge recently in all the intelligent design published research (so it can be peer-reviewed).</p>
<p>Oh&#8230;wait&#8230;</p>
<p>No.  </p>
<p>IDers want to circumvent the scientific process.  While other scientists work their butts off researching, writing, presenting, and defending their work, allowing it to be peer-reviewed and picked apart, IDers want to just skip all that by appealing to the general public and the government.  &#8220;Give us our place in the textbooks too!&#8221;</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t just a threat to biology.  It undermines all of science.  It&#8217;s frightening.</p>
<p><a href="http://airtightnoodle.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://airtightnoodle.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intelligent design Vs evolution theory - Ruahflames</title>
		<link>http://www.cbebs.org/2008/03/17/id-isnt-creationism-it-aint-science-either/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Intelligent design Vs evolution theory - Ruahflames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cbebs.org/2008/03/17/id-isnt-creationism-it-aint-science-either/#comment-468</guid>
		<description>[...] school science classes? Daniel Brooks: Intelligent Design as Imitatio Dei &#171; Science Notes CBEB&#8217;s &#124; ID isn&#8217;t Creationism? It ain&#8217;t science, either!           Tags: Creation, evolution, evolution theory, intelligent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] school science classes? Daniel Brooks: Intelligent Design as Imitatio Dei &laquo; Science Notes CBEB&#8217;s | ID isn&#8217;t Creationism? It ain&#8217;t science, either!           Tags: Creation, evolution, evolution theory, intelligent [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
